jump to navigation

A Person’s Words January 28, 2008

Posted by iamashadow in Immigration, editorial, history, human rights, illegal immigrants, illegal immigration, justice, law, life, media, personal, random, thoughts, undocumented student, undocumented students.
add a comment

So, this is another editorial like the one yesterday. It poses someone else’s opinion because right now I’m too busy to post my own. This editorial also agrees with my views. I don’t know where it comes from though, maybe the NY Times but I don’t have a link. Sorry. I’m just saying that the following are not my words. I’ll try to write something of my own later on but I can’t make any promises. School is taking over.

EDITORIAL; Ain’t That America

Published: October 22, 2007

Think of America’s greatest historical shames. Most have involved the singling out of groups of people for abuse. Name a distinguishing feature — skin color, religion, nationality, language — and it’s likely that people here have suffered unjustly for it, either through the freelance hatred of citizens or as a matter of official government policy.

We are heading down this road again. The country needs to have a working immigration policy, one that corresponds to economic realities and is based on good sense and fairness. But it doesn’t. It has federal inertia and a rising immigrant tide, and a national mood of frustration and anxiety that is slipping, as it has so many times before, into hatred and fear. Hostility for illegal immigrants falls disproportionately on an entire population of people, documented or not, who speak Spanish and are working-class or poor. By blinding the country to solutions, it has harmed us all.

The evidence can be seen in any state or town that has passed constitutionally dubious laws to deny undocumented immigrants the basics of living, like housing or the right to gather or to seek work. It’s in hot lines for citizens to turn in neighbors. It’s on talk radio and blogs. It’s on the campaign trail, where candidates are pressed to disown moderate positions. And it can be heard nearly every night on CNN, in the nativist drumming of Lou Dobbs, for whom immigration is an obsessive cause.

In New York, Gov. Eliot Spitzer has proposed allowing illegal immigrants to earn driver’s licenses. It is a good, practical idea, designed to replace anonymous drivers with registered competent ones. In show after show, Mr. Dobbs has trained his biggest guns on Mr. Spitzer, branding him with puerile epithets like ‘’spoiled, rich-kid brat” and depicting his policy as some sort of sanctuary program for the 9/11 hijackers. Someday there may be a calm debate, in Albany and nationally, about immigrant drivers. But with Mr. Dobbs at the megaphone, for now there is only histrionics and outrage.

Let’s concede an indisputable point: people should not be in the country illegally. But forget about the border for a moment — let’s talk about the 12 million who are already here. What should be done about them?

A. Deport them all.

B. Find out who they are. Distinguish between criminals and people who just want to work. Get them on the books. Make them pay what they owe — not just the income, Social Security, sales and property taxes they already pay, but all their taxes, and a fine. Get a smooth legal flow of immigrants going, and then concentrate on catching and deporting bad people.

C. Catch the few you can, and harass and frighten the rest. Treat the entire group as a de facto class of criminals, and disrupt or shout down anyone or any plan seen as abetting their evildoing.

Forget A. Congress tried a version of B, but it was flattened by outrage.

And so here we are at C. It’s a policy that can’t work; it’s too small-bore, too petty, too narrow. And all the while it’s not working, it can only lead to the festering of hate. Americans are a practical and generous people, with a tolerant streak a mile wide. But there is a combustible strain of nativism in this country, and it takes only a handful of match tossers to ignite it.

The new demagogues are united in their zeal to uproot the illegal population. They do not discriminate between criminals and the much larger group of ambitious strivers. They champion misguided policies, like a mythically airtight border fence and a reckless campaign of home invasions. And they summon the worst of America’s past by treating a hidden group of vulnerable people as an enemy to be hated and vanquished, not as part of a problem to be managed

The Irony of the Wall January 26, 2008

Posted by iamashadow in Immigration, dehumanization, editorial, history, human rights, illegal immigrants, illegal immigration, law, people, personal, politics, thoughts, undocumented student, undocumented students, videos, youtube.
5 comments

Another editorial of what would really happen if the wall was built. Nothing. Nothing would happen. Once again I am using another editorial by Jorge Ramos, the best news anchor in the Hispanic network of Univision. Also, at the end I will post once again the video from Penn and Teller that shows the the wall in fact only causes a delay of three minutes to undocumented immigrants in their journey here. The wall alone is not a solution. It is a simple and ignorant solution to a complex problem, and complex problems require complex thinking, compromise and ultimately, a complex thought out answer. Here is the editorial, translated from Spanish to English by me.

The Wall: Three minutes of delay
Hunger stronger than fear

By Jorge Ramos Avalos

There are presents that are not wanted. They are uncomfortable, and far from being good for those who get them, they are things that are only enjoyed by those who give them away. This is the case of the wall between Mexico and the US.

A gift not wanted

Bush’s government is giving away a very expensive wall to different border town, but the problem is that the cities don’t want accept that gift.

It is true. The mayors of the border towns like Eagle Pass and Del Rio, both from Texas, don’t want a wall.

“The way to protect the border is not with the wall” Efrain Valdez told me, the mayor of Del Rio. The undocumented ” will just take 3 more minutes to cross over, but either way, he is going to come here.”

Three minutes of delays. That is all. But either way all undocumented will still cross. With tunnels, ladders, hiding in vehicles, swimming and jumping. Hunger is stronger than fear.

Expensive wall

Last year 265 miles of the wall were constructed, according to the Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff own report. Y he hopes to get the total of almost 700 miles this year.

The price? Beyond the sky. Some 70 millions for every mile. And all of that to cause a delay of three minutes to undocumented.

“The wall will give everyone a false of security”, Chad Foster commented in an interview, the mayor of Eagle Pass. Why construct a wall?” asks Foster. “If we already have a natural division called Bravo River (or rio Grande, like it is called in the US.

They already have cameras

Effectively the river has divided the countries since 1848 some 1,254 miles of the border between Mexico and Texas. Also, Mayor Foster assures us, that there are already agents from the sheriff’s office, customs, the National Guard and ICE patrolling the border.

“We ask to protect the Texas border with more technology”, not with a wall, commented Foster.

Careful. It is not that either mayor, along with a lot of others from Texas, want open borders with Mexico. But they don’t believe that the border will do anything to deter the flow of immigrants minute by minute.

Why do they come?

The wall is forceful action against an economic problem. As long as there is hunger and unemployment in Latin America, and food, jobs, an education, and better opportunities for immigrants in the US, they will continue to risk everything and cross illegally.

Last year 400 immigrants died as they tried to cross. The number is lightly less than the year before. But the number is still terrible and important.

Nothing -no the wall, not the California fires, not the raids, not anymore agents at the border and the anti-immigrant sentiments in the rest of the country- is stopping undocumented.

Dry Land

It is important to find another solution. And it is a clear one: legalize those who are already here and give visas to the those who coming behind them (and the US needs them).

The wall is not working to stop undocumented, only delaying them or sending to pass through more difficult routes, there is another important matter: water.

“That worries us”, Mayor Valdez told me, “because the wall will take away our use of the rio Grande; it will take away the water.”

95 percents of those who share the river with Mexico are private owners. Those ranchers would not be able to take their animals to the river so they could drink water. And it would be more complicated for Texans who want to use the river rater to irrigate their crops, since there would be a wall dividing them.

Mexico would win

There is more. The mayors are afraid that the precise moment the wall starts getting built, the river will automatically belong to Mexico.

The international treaty between Mexico and US establishes that the border line is exactly in the middle of the river. But by constructing the wall in the American side, the mayors believe that the US would be giving away territory (and their part of the river) to Mexico, not on the legal sense but very much a physical one.

That is why, like Mayor Foster told me. “We are ready to fight until the very end so that there is no border wall in Texas.

A wall in the border between Mexico and Texas, like it is talked about in by the Bush administration, would affect commerce, the environment, distribution of war, the physical boundaries in between both countries and the most ironic of all, it won’t comply the promise of stopping undocumented in their tracks.

It will only delay them on their way three minutes. Three.

The following video contains profanity throughout the entire thing and nudity at the very end.

Where does it all come from? January 23, 2008

Posted by iamashadow in Immigration, civil rights, history, human rights, illegal immigrants, illegal immigration, personal, politics, thoughts, undocumented student, undocumented students.
9 comments

Where does all this fear of immigrants come from? Why has it turn to hatred? That’s really what it is, hateful anger against them. Why pick on those who can’t even defend themselves? If the American people want to blame anyone, they should look in the mirror. It is the American employer being at fault here. They are the ones who allow undocumented immigrants to come here and get jobs. They are the ones lowering wages because they are the ones paying the slave wages in the first place. Get angry when you go to Wal-Mart again and enjoy the cheap items you are getting.

History is repeating itself. And please, don’t bother on commenting on the fact that past immigrants waves coming in legally. Yeah, they came legally, because almost nothing was required to enter in the first place. They didn’t have to speak English at all. And for those who say, my ancestors came here and learned English, so are the immigrants of today. Second-generation immigrants can speak both languages and more than likely, know more English than Spanish.

But why all this fear? Why go after immigrant? Because they are easy to blame, when barely anyone stands up for them. Why stop allowing to get places to live? Immigrants go get jobs that allow mainstream America to have lower prices on stuff. But immigrants also buy stuff, pay rent, they are basically good people who couldn’t get in legally because it is nearly impossible to do so and they want to survive. So, really, why all the fear, because that’s what it is…

About the only thing that gives me solace now is the fact that I believe history will repeat itself and all the immigrants of today will be accepted by America. Because all of what is being said today, all the hatred of the ‘other’, it was said in the past and ultimately, those against immigrants never really stopped them from coming and staying.

The Times We Live On January 23, 2008

Posted by iamashadow in Immigration, civil rights, dehumanization, editorial, history, human rights, illegal immigrants, illegal immigration, personal, politics, thoughts, undocumented student, undocumented students.
add a comment

PROVIDENCE - To people such as Keith W. Stokes, the plight of illegal immigrants is perhaps the biggest civil rights issue of the day.
And in Stokes’ view, the United States must find a way to bring these people on a pathway to citizenship.

“I will offer the conclusion that the newest wave of foreign born in America and Rhode Island, with the proper supportive national and state public policies, will become the next wave of significant social, political and economic contributors to our great country and state as did the immigrants of the pat 400 years.”

Stokes’ job is executive director of the Newport County Chamber of Commerce, and his passion is history, particularly Newport history and black history.

Stokes spoke last week at the Rhode Island Civil Rights Roundtable, which was sponsored by Rhode Island for Community Justice and held at the Providence Black Repertory Theater. The event celebrated the life of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

In his talk, Stokes refused to use the term “illegal aliens,” saying it is better suited to science fiction movies like “ET” and “War of the Worlds.”

“The most description I will use is simply undocumented residents,” Stokes said. “The facts are clear that the undocumented residents that have entered and reside in our country and state illegally are mostly law abiding citizens and have come for the same reasons as nearly all of our ancestors before us - seeking to build a better life for themselves and their families. Those that break laws should be dealt with as all lawbreakers are - with all due process.”

Stokes traced Rhode Island’s history of tolerance to 1658, when a group of Sephardic Jewish families landed in Newport. They fled Brazil after the Portuguese conquered it and demanded that all citizens become members of the Catholic Church.

“They came to Newport because they heard of the rare opportunity for religious toleration,” Stokes said.

Eventually, West African slaves were shipped to Rhode Island, he said, and were emancipated in 1784, with the state becoming the fourth to provide such freedom.

Illegal immigration has been a hot topic in the 2008 presidential campaign, and a congressional immigration reform bill died in 2007, after voters sent an angry message to Capitol Hill about provisions to offer citizenship options.

However, Stokes said he believes most Americans oppose rounding up families and sending them back to their original countries. “Rational persons would also agree that building more prisons and security walls encircling America are not rational and affordable solutions,” he said.

Stokes was preaching to the choir - literally, as the Prism to Praise gospel group later performed. Steven Brown, executive director of the Rhode Island American Civil Liberties Union, echoed Stokes’ thoughts.

“I like what Keith had to say,” Brown said. “We not only need to remember history. We also need to examine it.”

Martin Luther King Jr. Day, part 3 January 21, 2008

Posted by iamashadow in Americans, civil rights, heroes, history, human rights, inspiration, justice, law, life, mentors, people, personal, politics, thoughts, videos, youtube.
2 comments

Video time. The following videos are the ones with Martin Luther King Jr. speaking.

First up, his speech against the Vietnam War. He mentions a very good quote, “that the hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.” I can only imagine what he would say today…

Bill O’Reilly vs. Martin Luther King Jr. Umm…I wonder who wins.

His last speech

The classic, I Have a Dream speech.

Martin Luther King Jr. Day, part 2 January 21, 2008

Posted by iamashadow in civil rights, heroes, history, human rights, inspiration, justice, law, life, mentors, people, personal, politics, thoughts.
add a comment

Here is a link to one of the best works written by King. The Letters from Birmingham which is something I love. I don’t remember when I read that piece of his, probably in my junior year of high school but don’t remember the specific moment. I really liked it than and still do now. The following quotes are some that I think are very true, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

“We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor, it must be demanded by the oppressed. Frankly, I have yet to engage in a direct-action campaign that was “well timed” in view of those who have not suffered unduly from the disease of segregation. For years now I have heard the word “wait!” It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing familiarity. This “Wait” has almost always meant “Never.” We must come to see, with one of our distinguished jurists, that “justice too long delayed is justice denied.”

“You express a great deal of anxiety over our willingness to break laws. This is certainly a legitimate concern. Since we so diligently urge people to obey the Supreme Court’s decision of 1954 outlawing segregation in the public schools, at first glance it may seem rather paradoxical for us consciously to break laws. One may ask: “How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?” The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that “an unjust law is no law at all.”

Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of Harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.”

Dr. King is great writer, and as a writer myself, I admire him for that. I encourage everyone to read the entire letter as well.

Martin Luther King Jr. Day, part 1 January 21, 2008

Posted by iamashadow in Americans, civil rights, heroes, history, human rights, inspiration, mentors, people, personal, quote, thoughts.
add a comment

In order to celebrate this day for a very honorable man, I will be dedicating the next couple of posts to covering some of the things that he said and wrote. I personally find Dr. King someone to be emulated and admired. He is a true American hero, one who stood for the rights of all.

First, a simple quote that speaks to everyone and the nature of the law, which is a human concept that is not always right.

“An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law.”

Myths and Facts about immigration January 18, 2008

Posted by iamashadow in Immigration, dehumanization, economy, history, human rights, illegal immigrants, illegal immigration, personal, politics, thoughts, undocumented students.
7 comments

I found this great article about the myths and facts of immigration. Everyone should read them, copied and pasted in its entirety.

A look behind the anti-immigrant furor

In the buildup to the 2008 elections, the right-wing Republicans have decided to make immigrants the scapegoat for the failure of the Bush administration and the shortcomings of the capitalist system. Right-wing personalities on cable TV, on talk radio and in newspapers are fueling this process. Vicious lies are being told about immigrants.

The questions and answers here are designed to provide you with accurate information about the impact of immigrant workers and their families, with or without papers, on the United States today.

Why are so many immigrants coming to the United States?

• Working people in Mexico and other poor countries have been devastated by the practices of U.S. and other international corporations. So-called free trade pacts like the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) are imposed with conditions that prevent poor countries from meeting their people’s needs.

• After NAFTA came into force, more than 1.3 million Mexican farmers were driven out of business. U.S. agribusiness, subsidized by our tax dollars, sold corn in Mexico at lower prices than farmers there could produce. Undocumented Mexican immigration to U.S. rose 60 percent.

• Big corporations in the United States have been glad to take advantage of the cheap labor, and have sent labor recruiters into economically depressed areas of Mexico, Central America and elsewhere.

So why don’t people in those countries fix their situation at home instead of coming here?

• U.S.-based multinational corporations have put heavy pressure on other countries, including Mexico, to keep their economies open to penetration by U.S. corporations.

• When these countries resist this pressure, the U.S. government and corporations intervene with threats, bribery and even military force to stop union organizing and political change from taking place.

• With this pro-business, anti-worker foreign policy, the U.S. government has sponsored coups, civil wars and dictators in Haiti, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua and Honduras.

My grandparents came from Europe legally. Why can’t people from Mexico and other countries do the same? Why do they butt ahead in line?

• It is not a matter of “butting in line.” There is no line for them to get in! In 2005, the U.S. government gave out only 5,000 permanent legal resident visas for low-skilled workers.

• Even people married to U.S. citizens or permanent legal residents sometimes have to wait years to join their spouses. This is a different situation from the one our grandparents faced.

• Today it is nearly impossible for most people who don’t have relatives here or specialized skills to come at all.

Do immigrants cause unemployment?

• There are not a fixed number of jobs in our economy. The truth is immigrant workers and their families, like all other workers, create jobs at a rate corresponding to those they fill.

• The real causes of unemployment are rooted in the decreasing wages being paid to all workers. Our country’s workers can no longer afford to buy the products they produce.

• Immigrant workers are not responsible for the millions of jobs wiped out by the shutting down of plants across the nation. They are not the cause of massive job loss which occurs when employers increase the workloads of some employees while laying off others.

Do immigrants drive down U.S. wages?

• It’s true that today U.S. workers are seeing their wages drop. This is especially true for young workers and people of color. But more than anything, this is due to a Congress and a president who refuse to raise the minimum wage to a living wage. It is due to right-wing policies that deny workers the right to form unions.

• Employers will always take advantage of workers who don’t have the right to defend themselves, using one group of vulnerable workers against the rest.

• Immigrants are not the cause of higher unemployment rates of African Americans and other U.S. minorities. The continued toleration of racial discrimination in hiring, the dismantling of affirmative action, and weak labor laws are to blame.

• The only effective response is to fight for equal treatment and equal rights for all workers. That is why the legalization of immigrant workers, with full labor and civil rights, is in the interest of us all.

Do immigrants join labor unions?

• Immigrant workers, even those without documents, have been at the forefront of many recent labor actions including organizing drives and strikes.

• One example is immigrant workers at Smithfield Foods’ meat-packing plant in North Carolina, who struck for safe working conditions alongside their African American and white co-workers.

• The roofers’ union reports huge organizing successes among immigrant workers in New Mexico.

• Immigrant workers are at the core of organizing efforts of laundry workers across the nation.

• Employers regularly use the threat of arrest and deportation to break up union actions where immigrant workers are involved. Nevertheless, union membership is growing even faster among immigrant workers than among others.

Do immigrants pay their fair share of taxes?

• Like other workers, most undocumented and documented immigrant workers have both federal and state income taxes deducted from their paychecks. An undocumented worker picking tomatoes in Florida pays more income taxes proportionally than many corporate executives.

• Undocumented workers pay $7 billion a year into Social Security. However, they are ineligible to collect any benefits.

• Immigrants, like the rest of us, pay sales taxes every time they buy something. They pay property taxes too, either on property they own or through their rent.

What about the crime rate among immigrants?

• Numerous studies show that the rate of violent and property crime among immigrants, with or without documents, is lower than that of comparable sectors of the U.S. population, even though anti-immigrant agitators try to give the opposite impression by highlighting isolated cases of shocking crimes.

What about terrorism?

• Undocumented immigrant workers were not linked to 9/11 or any other recent terrorist attack. Every one of the 9/11 terrorists came here on a legal visa issued by the United States government.

• The vast majority of undocumented and documented immigrants have nothing whatever to do with terrorism, and come here only to work and be with family.

• If hard-working immigrants could have a legal way of coming here, the danger of terrorists entering secretly would be lessened.

What is the impact of immigrants on social, health care and educational services?
• Immigrant workers are not getting a free ride. Like other workers, most immigrants pay the same federal, state and local taxes which finance our schools, health clinics and other public services.

• Immigrant workers, alongside their native-born co-workers, generate fortunes for their employers in industries such as agribusiness, meatpacking, hotels, restaurants and construction.

• However, Republican administrations since Reagan have given the super-rich huge tax cuts. If these were rolled back, there would be enough money to finance needed services for everybody: immigrant and U.S.-born.

• There is no evidence that new immigrants pose a public health danger to their neighbors. Indeed, studies show that they are on the whole healthier than comparable sectors of the U.S.-born population.

Do immigrants threaten the English language and American culture?

• There have always been other languages spoken alongside English in the United States, including Native American (Indian) languages, Spanish in the Southwest and Florida, French in Louisiana and German dialects in Pennsylvania.

• Our country’s experience has been that while new immigrants may struggle a bit with the language, the second generation always speaks English fluently. This is just as true of Latino immigrants today as it was of other immigrants in the past.

• All over the country, classes to teach English to non-English speakers are jammed full.

• The vast majority of new immigrants believe fervently in democracy, family, freedom and social justice, and thus are a boon to our values, not a menace.

What is really behind the anti-immigrant furor?

• Right-wing politicians and their media supporters want to distract the public’s attention from the scandals of the Bush administration, the war in Iraq, the health care crisis, the loss of good-paying manufacturing jobs and the home foreclosures disaster. They are using the “illegal immigrant” scare to do this.

• Big business interests want cheap labor but do not want low-paid workers to have rights. So they whip up scare campaigns against immigrant workers. Their aim is to keep them quiet and underpaid, and the workers divided.

• Hard-core racist forces are using the immigration issue to whip up hate and fear against Mexicans, other Latinos, Africans, Middle Easterners and South Asians. Their strategy is to give legitimacy to racist attitudes and policies in this country. This works to the detriment not only of immigrants but of all U.S. minorities and the rest of us.

What is the solution?

The solution is not to hang a “keep out” sign on the Statue of Liberty’s torch. The solution is not to waste vast amounts of taxpayer money on a useless and environmentally destructive fence. The solution is to carry out a comprehensive, worker-friendly immigration reform including:

• Legalization of the current undocumented immigrants, as quickly and cheaply as possible, with full labor and civil rights and a clear path to citizenship.

• Changes in U.S. visa policies so that ordinary working people who want to come here and live and work can do so without violating laws or risking their lives.

• Avoidance of guest worker schemes that keep foreign workers in conditions of serfdom without the right to defend themselves or integrate themselves into our society.

• Giving immigrant workers the same rights on the job and in the community that other workers have, so they can join unions and fight together for better wages and working conditions.

• Changes in U.S. trade and foreign policy so that the development of the economies of poorer countries is no longer undermined by multinational corporate interests or U.S. government interference.

For more information and sources:

• “They Take Our Jobs! and 20 Other Myths About Immigration” www.beacon.org.

• “The Politics of Immigration: Questions and Answers” www.monthlyreview.org.

• The Pew Hispanic Center www.pewhispanic.org.

• Migration Policy Institute www.immigrationinformation.org.

• Immigration Policy Center www.immigrationpolicy.org.

• The People’s Weekly World/Nuestro Mundo www.pww.org, and Political Affairs www.politicalaffairs.net.

Quote January 16, 2008

Posted by iamashadow in history, life, personal, quote.
add a comment

I haven’t done one in a while so here is a new one! I like this one, very inspiring I think. Shine away…

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us. We ask ourselves, who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous, talented, and fabulous? Actually, who are you not to be? You are a child of God. Your playing small doesn’t serve the world. There’s nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won’t feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine, as children do. We are born to make manifest the glory of God that is within us. It’s not just in some of us, it’s in everyone. And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others.
-Nelson Mandela, 1994

History repeats itself January 10, 2008

Posted by iamashadow in Immigration, dehumanization, history, human rights, illegal immigrants, illegal immigration, personal, politics, thoughts, undocumented student.
add a comment

Here is an article showing how history repeats itself in regards to immigration. I don’t think it should have to, but we never learn from our mistakes it seems. It’s a little old too, sorry about that.

A throw-back embarrassment

WHO said this? “Immigration to this country is increasing and is making its greatest relative increase from races most alien to the body of the American people and from the lowest and most illiterate classes among those races … half of whom have no occupation and most of whom represent the rudest form of labor.

“The immigrants who come to the United States reduce the rate of wages by ruinous competition, and then take their savings out of the country. Home as a foreign country. … They have no interest or stake in country and never become American citizens.” Many, he went on, are genetically prone to crime, insanity and disease.

Five points credit if you guessed it isn’t Rep. (and late presidential candidate) Tom “throw all illegals out” Tancredo of Colorado, or Mitt Romney, or Rush Limbaugh or Lou Dobbs of CNN.

Two more points if you recognized it as not coming from anyone in this century. A perfect 10 if you traced it back to the last decades of the 19th century.

The author, in a pair of articles on “The Restriction of Immigration” for The Atlantic magazine in 1891, was Rep. (later Sen.) Henry Cabot Lodge of Massachusetts. His undesirables were Jews, Italians, Poles and Hungarians, people like Tancredo’s Sicilian great-grandparents. In those days, of course, everybody was undocumented.

So you can say that the current debate among GOP candidates Rudy Giuliani and Romney about who would be the meanest, toughest guy on illegal immigration is in an American tradition almost as old as immigration itself. Giuliani’s father, an Italian immigrant who served prison time for robbery, and was a collector for Giuliani’s mob-connected uncle, would have been a perfect example for Lodge. The tradition goes back to the Salem witch trials — and “No Irish Need Apply” and “The Chinese Must Go,” and “Japs keep moving.” Not all of it was overtly racist. The official targets of the Great Red Scare of the 1920s were communists and anarchists, although most of them also happened to be Italian immigrants. In the notorious Sacco-Vanzetti case, two Italian immigrant anarchists were convicted and executed for a robbery-murder in Braintree, Mass. in 1920 that they probably didn’t commit.

And there was, of course, the pursuit of communists, alleged communists and “fellow travelers” in the 1950s, and the blacklists and loyalty oaths that came with it. Americans were encouraged (and often pressured) to denounce colleagues and associates they suspected.

Hollywood producers, politicians and university trustees, including the regents of the University of California, folded under the pressure. Many of the blacklisted never recovered.

The present furor about illegal immigrants isn’t quite like any of those things.

But the attempt to exploit anti-immigrant rage and fear by politicians such as Romney and Giuliani and by the radio talkers that thrive on the issue comes awfully close.

A new Arizona law that will go into effect next Tuesday if it’s not blocked by the courts would yank the license of any business employing illegals. In that respect, it’s similar to hundreds of other state laws and local ordinances passed in the past year.

But its invitation to ordinary people to report to local authorities any businesses they believe employ illegals makes it a great vehicle for race-baiters and grudge-bearers.

Some Republicans, Karl Rove probably included, are tearing their hair. Rove and his former boss, George W. Bush, worked hard to appeal to the growing body of Latino voters. But like John McCain, they got ripped for their sponsorship of the comprehensive immigration reform bill that got filibustered to death by hard-liners last June.

And now that immigration is again a hot-button issue, Romney and Giuliani, among others, have taken a page from former California Gov. Pete Wilson’s old 1994 playbook, trading short-term political gain for disastrous long-term losses in support from the growing ranks of Latino voters.

“Some in the party seem pleased,” said former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson. “They should be terrified.”

Until recently, McCain and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee were the honorable exceptions among the GOP candidates. Huckabee, who got whacked by Romney for backing in-state tuition for the children of illegal immigrants, replied, “In all due respect, we are a better country than to punish children for what their parents did.”

But since then, as he rose in the polls (and read the polls) he’s signed on to his own version of the Tancredo creed. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton, like Giuliani another recent convert who’s read the same polls, is running for cover.

The damage is not only to rational discourse about immigration but in the futile diversion from the real sources of the real fears — about off-shoring and job security, health care, corporate power and fraud and a long list of fading certainties — that feed the issue.

Sooner or later we’ll probably look back at this episode with the same embarrassment and shame as we did the others, but it could be an ugly time until we get there.

The article can be found in its original form here.